yes, hares are rabbits. theyre just a different breed.
no but they are in the same family, there is a significant difference too, hares have bigger ears and legs, they have a lager appearance as well, you cant keep a hare as a pet and with a rabbit you can, people have already tried keeping hares in captivity but they all passed away... so if anyone asks say that hares are not the same as rabbits.
-Hannah (age 13)
Of course, rabbits and hares are in the same family of Legamorphs.
The collective nouns for rabbits are: bury of rabbits colony of rabbits down of rabbits drove of rabbits husk of rabbits leash of rabbits trace of rabbits trip of rabbits warren of rabbits nest of rabbits (young) wrack of rabbits (young) And for hares: drove of hares down of hares husk of hares leash of hares trace of hares trip of hares warren of hares I hope this is useful!
yes
Rabbits are similar to hares, but rabbits are born furless and with their eyes closed, and they cannot move for a few days. Hares are born fully furred with their eyes open, and can run a few hours after birth. Hares also have larger ears and powerful hind legs.
Rabbits, hares and pikas are all lagomorphs.
No, rabbits and hares are the same thing.
Rabbits, hares, and pikas are known as Lagomorphs.
No. Rabbits and hares were found about 53 million years ago
Faster than rabbits but around the same as hares. Hares are 45 mph (72 kph). Whilst guinea pigs are 39-47 mph (68-77 mph).
I'm just gonna guess yes.
rabbits and hares hop the same and look the same but they have different facial features
nice rabbits and hares