Philosophers disagree. Some believe, like those who believe in the doctrine of original sin, that humans are naturally evil. Some, like most buddhists, believe that humans are naturally good. Some, like many scientists, believe that humans are naturally neither good nor evil.
.
Humans, are both. We are not all good, but we are not all bad either. Just so I don't carry on. Your answer is Both.
God gave us free will God gave humans free will 0
Hobbes
They learn by their sorroundings
Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Humans are neither good nor evil, but share a set of natural rights and needs.
evil
Hanfeizi believed that humans were naturally bad, while Laozi believed that humans were naturally good.
Hanfeizi
Rousseau believed that human evil was caused by society.
Only evil.
Mostly good but some evil as punishment.
Apollo gave evil to humans because he would slaughter them
People disagree on whether man is naturally good or bad. Here are some opinions:Man is naturally evil. don't trust anyone
He brought Good
He believed that people were good in their natural state and we are only influenced to do bad. he opposed Hobbes thoughts that human kind was naturally selfish and evil. Rousseau believed that humans naturally have good morals because they are able to empathize with others.
In the Bible story, only humans ate the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, so only humans had this knowledge.
Aphrodite was to bring both good and evil to humans to show them love and effection but to also break hearts and give undesireable feelings
Unlike Confucius or Laozi, Hanfeizi taught that humans were naturally evil. He believed that they needed harsh laws and stiff punishments to force them to do their duty. Hope this helps. :)