They learn by their sorroundings
The nature of human beings is complex and can vary from person to person. Some may argue that humans have the capacity for both good and evil, while others may believe that humans are inherently good but influenced by external factors. Ultimately, it is difficult to categorize all human beings as purely good or evil as individuals are capable of both positive and negative actions.
It seems to me the moral distinction or demarcation of human acts such as right and wrong, good and bad, must be determined by the views and opinions of the majority at different time and place, taken into account of its prevailing political system and religion as well as its cultural traditions.
The central debate in the good vs. evil philosophy revolves around whether humans are inherently good or evil, and how this impacts their actions and behavior.
Philosophers disagree. Some believe, like those who believe in the doctrine of original sin, that humans are naturally evil. Some, like most buddhists, believe that humans are naturally good. Some, like many scientists, believe that humans are naturally neither good nor evil. .
The concept of good and evil is subjective and varies among different cultures and individuals. Some argue that humans have an inherent sense of morality, while others believe that good and evil are learned behaviors influenced by society and environment. Ultimately, the presence of good and evil in human nature is a complex topic with no definitive answer.
The short answer is no. The practice of any spiritual path, as long as that practice improves the people who practice it, is essentially good. All spiritual paths are followed by human beings and all human beings are flawed. We make mistakes, we do wrong in large or small ways, and we can be petty, hurtful or just oblivious to others. We can also be caring, giving, kind, and startlingly good. No spiritual path is intrinsically evil. Misunderstood, or misrepresented, but not evil.
The nature of human beings is complex and can vary from person to person. Some may argue that humans have the capacity for both good and evil, while others may believe that humans are inherently good but influenced by external factors. Ultimately, it is difficult to categorize all human beings as purely good or evil as individuals are capable of both positive and negative actions.
Only evil.
Mostly good but some evil as punishment.
Apollo gave evil to humans because he would slaughter them
Trolls are almost always portrayed as evil and stupid beings. They eat humans and live under bridges. Elves, however, are more variable. They are usually portrayed as good and magical creatures, although they are also sometimes evil.
He brought Good
In Islamic theology, jinns are believed to be made of smokeless fire. They are supernatural beings that are capable of free will, similar to humans, and are mentioned in the Quran. Jinns can be good or evil and exist in a parallel world to humans.
It seems to me the moral distinction or demarcation of human acts such as right and wrong, good and bad, must be determined by the views and opinions of the majority at different time and place, taken into account of its prevailing political system and religion as well as its cultural traditions.
Aphrodite was to bring both good and evil to humans to show them love and effection but to also break hearts and give undesireable feelings
In the Bible story, only humans ate the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, so only humans had this knowledge.
Good! She gave them each love.