At common law, contracts made with minors are voidable. This means that a child that enters into a contract and then repudiates it cannot be held liable. However, a non-minor party is bound and liable. Since the contract is not void, it is deemed to exist; however, the limitations on liability severely reduce the consequences of repudiation where the minor-party is concerned.
There is one narrow exception for "necessities". Also, it is possible for a minor child to enter into a contract, at which time it is voidable, and then for the former child-party to ratify the contract once the former child-party has reached age of majority. It thereafter is enforceable against the former child-party. In seeking to enforce these types of contracts it might be possible to prove a lack of a capacity on the part of a child to understand the consequences of his or her actions or words in entering into a contract, but this would have to be a peculiar or extraordinary situation.
A cosign agreement is usually just a financial agreement to cover the rent or damages if your son can't pay. I don't think it has anything to with underage drinking.
A class Y felony generally involves parties under the age of 18. Drug sale to minors and rape of minors are considered class Y felonies.
eefects of minor agreements
You should definitely not host passion parties in front of minors!
ONLY if both parties are minors!
Piercing is considered and elective procedure and with any procedure that is invasive* (*cutting into the body) there are risks and complications that need to be acknowledged. Minors may not always focus on the risk factors and therefore they are not competent under the eyes of the law when it comes to signing and understanding a release on hold harmless agreement which is required to be signed before a service like piercing is provided.
Usually, minors are not responsible contracts they may agree too, because they lack capacity to contract.
Minors from newborn to age 18 are considered in custody disputes in court. Once a "minor" has turned 18, he or she is legally considered an adult, and therefore no longer is considered a "minor."
Yes, but not as completely as if they were adults. Being minors there ARE other constraints imposed on them that are considered lawful.
Yes, however keep this in mind; Under the law minors are not 'competent' to be a party to a legally enforceable contract. That being said: Minors also cannot bring suit to protect their own interests. Their parents/guardians must do it for them.
Minors are not allowed to make contracts, (except for certain things), and cannot be held to the agreement to pay back what they borrowed. Hence, snce they don't have to pay it back, they can't get a card on their own
It is not in some states and cities if you get parental consent. Youth are not considered to have the ability to understand the consequences of their actions. As such they cannot enter into an agreement such as a contract for a tattoo without an adult vouching for them. People that tattoo minors can be charged with assault and mutilation.