0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
You find that there are compelling arguments for opposing arguments in response to your research question what can you do?
Both arguments Pick the position you think you can argue most persuasively for Do more research to try to break the "tie"
What advantages does being able to symbolize your arguments provide Are there disadvantages to using this technique to make the structure of your arguments more explicit and clear?
What advantages does being able to symbolize your argument provide.
When there are compelling arguments for either side of an argument its more difficult to draw a conclusion In cases like these you can take one of two approaches Do more to try to break the?
research; argue more persuasively
When there are compelling arguments for either side of an argument it's more difficult to draw a conclusion In cases like these you can take one of two approaches do more to try to break the?
research; argue more persuasively
What are more analytical and explicit in giving information to the reader than poetry?
explicit
Who has a stronger argument on same-sex marriage society or religion?
There is a lot of overlap between the two groups you mentioned: society and religion. I'll assume you mean secular society v. religious groups. The answer is that each side finds their own arguments more compelling. However, it is the secular arguments that hold up better in a court of law. Courts of law regularly reject arguments that are based solely on religious beliefs.
Why is it useful for historians to craft historical narrative?
Narratives allow history to be presented as an interesting story
Which of the arguments for or against the ESA do you find more compelling?
The second argument which was against the ESA. It was written by Peyton knight he had a lot of statistics and numbers in his argument and the other guy Bob Davison just talked about what a good program it is and how it is helping. He wasn't as specific.
Why its useful for historians to craft historical narratives?
Narratives allow history to be presented as an interesting story
Are there disadvantages to using this technique to make the structure of your arguments more explicit and clear?
Yes, your argument may not sound natural in front of others because you are trying to make sure you follow the pattern. If you focus on the technique, you could possibly forget your argument.
Are all rappers explicit?
Yeah, I BetLil Wayne, Drake, 2 Chainz, Nicki Minaj and more are so EXPLICIT
Was it the heroism of the Greeks or the Persian Empire?
Which did what? Be more explicit.
