yes
Answer:
Prejudices are only a concern if they conflict with the case before the court. As an example a prejudice against French people would not affect a case involving a Korean and Japanese businessmen in a dispute over shares in an American company.
Most people do have prejudices against something. The jury pool would be small if only people totally without prejudice could be eligible to serve.
Atticus explains that he feels it's because they're not part of the average run of people, but also highlights that Miss Maudie can't serve on juries because she's a woman. He underscores the importance of serving on juries as a civic duty despite biases and prejudices.
A group of diverse people from different walks of life serving on a jury. Juries are supposed to be representative to ensure the case be considered from different views points and that individual prejudices or opinions do not get in the way of a fair trial.
lol
Yes genocide is a prime example of how cultural prejudices impact society.
People cannot be excluded from serving on court juries on the basis of race.
People develop prejudices through socialization, upbringing, personal experiences, and exposure to stereotypes and biases. These prejudices can be ingrained through cultural norms, media influence, and lack of exposure to diverse perspectives. Additionally, fear, ignorance, and a desire to belong to a certain group can contribute to the development of prejudices.
The juries were large, usually 500 strong. There were no judges or lawyers -people pleaded their own case, and the juries made decisions on both guilt and punishment.
The deaths of the people prevented further battle in Veracruz.
Pericles.
jury pool
they used people's prejudices to further the Nazi cause.
The death penalty is the death penalty. It condemns no one. It is a legitimate judicial act of the State. On the other hand, juries condemn people. Juries are part of the judicial system. Juries react to evidence and lawyers' pleadings and questionings, an arguably subjective process. Innocent people die because the judicial system is not perfect and juries and district attorneys and public defenders are fallible. Whenever people are in the loop, there will be errors. On the other hand, there are some people in our society who take lives, commit unspeakable crimes, and need to be held accountable for them. It is for them that the death penalty is reserved, and for whom it is highly appropriate.