No! The horses of prehistoric times were diminutive. They didn't have the long legs and sleek bodies.
Prehistoric horses were much smaller. The horses we see today have one toe ( the hoof) and a remnant of another (the chestnut). Horses from that time had multiple toes, and as they evolved, they had less and less toes. To answer your question, that would be no. Horses in these periods are much faster that they were then.
Yes, because they had tiger blood...
zebras can run faster than horses
no
No
it could go faster than horses
a oxen is faster then horses because it looks faster
yes
The gallop is faster than a canter, and the canter is faster then a trot.
yes
It cannot. They did not have books to learn from.
Yes. The last evidence of prehistoric horses in North America were gone before 7000 BC. They have evolved a lot. They started out small than a dog.