Yes, because they had tiger blood...
No! The horses of prehistoric times were diminutive. They didn't have the long legs and sleek bodies.
Prehistoric horses were much smaller. The horses we see today have one toe ( the hoof) and a remnant of another (the chestnut). Horses from that time had multiple toes, and as they evolved, they had less and less toes. To answer your question, that would be no. Horses in these periods are much faster that they were then.
zebras can run faster than horses
no
No
No
it could go faster than horses
yes
a oxen is faster then horses because it looks faster
No horses originated
The gallop is faster than a canter, and the canter is faster then a trot.
There are no prehistoric breeds in these 2 regions.