No
No horses originated
There are no prehistoric breeds in these 2 regions.
There are no prehistoric horses in these two regions.
No! The horses of prehistoric times were diminutive. They didn't have the long legs and sleek bodies.
NO
Yes, because they had tiger blood...
Prehistoric horses were much smaller. The horses we see today have one toe ( the hoof) and a remnant of another (the chestnut). Horses from that time had multiple toes, and as they evolved, they had less and less toes. To answer your question, that would be no. Horses in these periods are much faster that they were then.
prehistoris horses r lot's smaller and they have more hooves
There are horses in Australia. Australia has a thriving horse racing and equestrian community. I live in Perth, Western Australia myself and there are around 15 horses stabled in a property just a couple of miles down the road from me.
The horses brought to Australia by the First Fleet, came from England.
No they do not,Modern horses have one toe on each foot.It's called a hoof. Prehistoric horses had three toes, two that did not touch the floor.http://wiki.answers.com/How_many_toes_do_horses_have#ixzz18rggIRlL
Kind of. The closest relation horses have to zebras is the prehistoric species, pliohippus. The horse is under the equus family, as equus cabalus, and the zebra is under anius. Kind of. The closest relation horses have to zebras is the prehistoric species, pliohippus. The horse is under the equus family, as equus cabalus, and the zebra is under anius. Kind of. The closest relation horses have to zebras is the prehistoric species, pliohippus. The horse is under the equus family, as equus cabalus, and the zebra is under anius.