The rattlesnake is a reptile. It cannot be a mammal because it is not warm-blooded and does not nurse its young. It cannot be an amphibian because it does not have gills to breathe underwater (this is done by frogs and toads).
Neither of those it is a reptile.
None of the above. Snakes are reptiles.
Reptiles
Sharks are neither amphibians, mammals or reptiles. Sharks are fish.
Amphibians? No, they are reptiles, like all snakes, lizards, and chelonians.
Fish, and then amphibians, and then reptiles, and then mammals
No, while rattlesnakes can swim, they are reptiles and not amphibians.
Amphibians , reptiles , mammals along with birds are included in Tetrapod Vertebrates .
No they are not mammals. Amphibians and Reptiles are other classes of animals at the same level as the mammals. Mammals have hair, are warm blooded and give birth to live young. Amphibians and reptiles reproduce using eggs.
Now That Is Just Ridiculous. Everyone Knows That Rhinos Are Mammals. Not Reptiles And Amphibians. So It Is Neither Of Them. They Are Mammals.
reptiles and amphibians have the most in common
No - all snakes are reptiles.
Neither...They were reptiles. dinosaurs were nether amphibians or mammals they were all reptiles, though they are more closely related to birds.
They are mammals.