Believers as in (christians)...believe that there is a God. And they believe that He made ALL things, including man. There are many different religions though. Depends on what you call believers. Yes, in three senses: First, the general order and regulation of the natural world (e.g. elegant, immutable physical laws, species reproducing after kind, complex interdependencies between things) argue for the concept of an intelligent designer. Second, the preservation or "perseverance" of the natural world (cyclical geological and biological renewal, persistent order rather than descent into chaos) argues for the concept of a benevolent sustainer. Third, the innate, universal religiosity of world cultures argues for a single, ancient anthropological point of origin. Of course, rationalistic believers can and do draw opposite conclusions given the same data; but the original question, whether religious believers can be justified in what they think about origins from observing natural phenomena demands an unequivocal "yes."
Your statement is false and can not be justified. An aquarium is not a natural ecosystem.
Scientific thinking relies on evidence, reason, and the scientific method to understand the natural world, while religious thinking is often faith-based and relies on beliefs, teachings, and traditions to derive knowledge about the world and our place in it. Scientific thinking is testable and subject to revision based on new evidence, whereas religious thinking is often based on interpretation of sacred texts and authority figures.
Landowners justified owning slaves by claiming that it was necessary for the economy and their way of life. They argued that slaves were inferior and in need of their guidance, and that it was their duty to provide for and protect them. They also used religious and philosophical arguments to support the idea that slavery was justified and natural.
A natural habbit is something you do alot mostly without thinking.
Some people justified slavery by using religious arguments, such as citing passages from the Bible that appeared to condone enslavement. They interpreted these passages to suggest that slavery was a natural, God-ordained institution and that slaves should obey their masters. This religious justification helped perpetuate the institution of slavery by giving it a moral veneer to those who subscribed to such beliefs.
Atheists typically view suffering as a natural part of life that arises from various causes such as biological, social, and environmental factors. They may see suffering as a problem to be addressed through empathy, compassion, and practical solutions rather than relying on religious beliefs or supernatural intervention.
cheese
It's full of religious people.
Devastation.
It justified the right to revolt against a government, that no longer guaranteed the man's natural and inalienable rights
You may be thinking of Lanolin, which is a lotion made from sheep.
It is the order in which something is done, according to a way of thinking.