Yes, almost any measurement has a range of uncertainty. In addition, you must consider the errors inherent in taking samples, and the expert opinion on the reliability of the test method.
With fingerprints for example, these are commonly considered infallible. But that depends upon how many points of comparison were made. [The points of comparison are forks, whorls, arches, and so on of the fingerprint ridges.] Currently, a 7 point match is considered good, but a 4 or 5 point match is much more suspect.
In science in general, peer review of test methods is one of the 'gold standards'. In the case of fingerprints, say, the peer review test should be carried out on a number of prints, at a number of laboratories.
Seldom does evidence presented have such a quality history.
Polygraphs are used as an interrogation tool with criminal suspects or candidates for sensitive public or private sector employment. The use and effectiveness of the polygraph is controversial, with the manner of its use and its validity subject to increasing criticism.
Forensic evidence is not 'sampled,' it is ANALYZED, by taking a 'sample' of it and conducting laboratory or or other technical tests or analyses of it.
Yes as they are negative you can conclude, the test is negative and nothing to worry.
criminal profiler criminologist forensic scientist crime scene investigator forensic chemist fingerprint expert
zvx
Polygraphs are used as an interrogation tool with criminal suspects or candidates for sensitive public or private sector employment. The use and effectiveness of the polygraph is controversial, with the manner of its use and its validity subject to increasing criticism.
The blood tests made a conclusive diagnosis. Conclusive testing can show positive or negative results. Conclusive simply means definite. While the patient had a preliminary diagnosis of leukemia, negative results of tests were conclusive.
Conclusive means to prove something. A sentence with conclusive in it would be, the tests were not conclusive, so they had to try different types of testing.
Forensic drug testing is to identify unknown powders, liquids and pills that may be illicit drugs. There are basically two categories of forensic tests used to analyze drugs and other unknown substances. They are Presumptive tests and Confirmatory tests.
If you are talking about the medical examiner, who interprets and reports the results of the toxicology screenings/tests, then yes - they are MDs. However, forensic labratory technicians who run the tests are not. Usually a Bachelor's degree with specialized training in forensic science is required.
There are some free tests online to practice but a test is not required to become a forensic scientist. In most cases, all that is needed a Bachelor's Degree in Forensic Science. A test completion does however improve your resume for such a career.
Flame tests are used to help identify substances used in murders
Forensic evidence is not 'sampled,' it is ANALYZED, by taking a 'sample' of it and conducting laboratory or or other technical tests or analyses of it.
Yes as they are negative you can conclude, the test is negative and nothing to worry.
You will be able to find credible forensic science tests by looking on the websites of recognised and certified institutions such as universities and technical colleges. Beware of sites that are not attached to a physical institution and who ask for fees upfront.
There are some free tests online to practice but a test is not required to become a forensic scientist. In most cases, all that is needed a Bachelor's Degree in Forensic Science. A test completion does however improve your resume for such a career.
Flame tests allow you to get some idea of what substances make up a given sample. It is particularly useful for the identification of polymers, because many of them give off unique burn patterns.