There is no credible scientific evidence1 that artificial sweeteners, when used as directed by human beings, are problematic, despite their effects on mice in limited experiments (who, contrary to common opinion, do not react to chemicals the same as humans).
This is a common urban myth. Most material to this effect, if traced to its source, comes from one website with a severe bias (reason unknown) against the artificial sweetener industry.
1Credible scientific evidence: Documented results of properly-constructed tests that have been reviewed by other experts and published in recognized scientific journals, and that can be repeated by anyone who duplicates the experiment. The mouse experiments were not repeated successfully.
Yes it can feed on sugar substitutes Yes it can feed on sugar substitutes Yes it can feed on sugar substitutes
It means there is no sugar, but there are sugar substitutes.
Yes, you can have sugar substitutes such as splenda. Much better for a low carb diet.
Currently there are 15 approved sugar substitutes in use in today's market. Additionally, some of these do have a blend which is used for just cooking and ...
Calorie free sugar substitutes contain no carbohydrates. Therefore, they do not affect blood glucose levels.
honey and agave nectar and artificial sweeteners.
yes the lichens are harmful but to some humans
earthworms are not harmful to humans theyare just pink and slimmyNo. Worms that are harmful to humans are roundworms, flatworms and hookworms.
Phone radiation can be harmful to humans. It is harmful when the person is on the phone a lot.
They are not harmful to humans
Stevia is actually healthy. There are other sugar substitutes but they are generally not healthy.
No, first of all it is not a necessity for life, second there are many substitutes for sugar therefore it is not inelastic.