At lower energy, a system is more stable. At a higher energy, the system will have a tendency to achieve a lower energy. For example, a ball tends to roll down a slope, a compressed (or extended) spring tends to relax.
At lower energy, a system is more stable. At a higher energy, the system will have a tendency to achieve a lower energy. For example, a ball tends to roll down a slope, a compressed (or extended) spring tends to relax.
At lower energy, a system is more stable. At a higher energy, the system will have a tendency to achieve a lower energy. For example, a ball tends to roll down a slope, a compressed (or extended) spring tends to relax.
At lower energy, a system is more stable. At a higher energy, the system will have a tendency to achieve a lower energy. For example, a ball tends to roll down a slope, a compressed (or extended) spring tends to relax.
Nature prefers lower energy, so a higher energy level is less stable. The generation of light is an example of electrons, excited to a higher energy level, want to relax by dropping to a lower energy level, if available, giving out photons as the price to pay.
At lower energy, a system is more stable. At a higher energy, the system will have a tendency to achieve a lower energy. For example, a ball tends to roll down a slope, a compressed (or extended) spring tends to relax.
Natural systems left to themselves move towards states of lower potential energy. For example, water flows down a hill or a ball rolls down a hill, if free to do so. States of lower potential energy are more stable. As a rule, the lower the potential energy of a system, the more stable it is. As a result, left to themselves, systems attempt to reach the configuration with the lowest energy possible under a given set of constraints. To change the state of a system from lower to higher potential energy, one must therefore supply energy to the system.
It depends on a few things. If you mean thermodynamically stable, then no. The product of an endothermic reaction is higher in potential energy than the reactant(s) and will eventually release that energy and revert back (if it doesn't go on to some other product). If you mean kinetically stable, then maybe. It really depends on the relative energy of any intermediates formed in the conversion of reactant(s) to product(s). This relative energy is also known as activation energy. If the activation energy is high, then the product would be relatively stable. If the activation energy is low, then the product would not be stable.
energy increases or decreases until a stable or quasi-stable state is reached
An atom is in its ground state when all the electrons in the atom occupy orbitals that result in the minimum chemical potential energy for the atom as a whole. An excited atom is one that stores (at least for a brief interval) additional chemical potential energy as a result of at least one of the electrons in it occupying an orbital with higher energy than the orbital(s) the electrons in the same atom would occupy in the ground state of the atom.
Because the molecular energy is higher in the 13-cis than 7 & 11-cis.
Natural systems left to themselves move towards states of lower potential energy. For example, water flows down a hill or a ball rolls down a hill, if free to do so. States of lower potential energy are more stable. As a rule, the lower the potential energy of a system, the more stable it is. As a result, left to themselves, systems attempt to reach the configuration with the lowest energy possible under a given set of constraints. To change the state of a system from lower to higher potential energy, one must therefore supply energy to the system.
i don't have an idea but i believe it is when they are stable
Stable means a minimum of Gibbs free energy. Potential energy comes in many flavors, but an example of less potential energy and more disorder is the death of an organism. While it is alive, it is full of potential, and order, and is at a sort of steady state. If it is dead, disorder sets in and it approaches an equilibrium state. The issue is entropy and the second law of thermodynamics.
It depends on a few things. If you mean thermodynamically stable, then no. The product of an endothermic reaction is higher in potential energy than the reactant(s) and will eventually release that energy and revert back (if it doesn't go on to some other product). If you mean kinetically stable, then maybe. It really depends on the relative energy of any intermediates formed in the conversion of reactant(s) to product(s). This relative energy is also known as activation energy. If the activation energy is high, then the product would be relatively stable. If the activation energy is low, then the product would not be stable.
when an electron gains too much energy it has to move to a higher energy level to keep the atom stable by this atom remains conserved and when electrons get less excited they seem to disapper and reapper in the lower energy levels....this can be learnt via quantum physics chapter of laws of quantum mechanics......
The products of an endothermic reaction are less chemically stable. They required an input of energy to create so naturally they are at a higher energy state.
When de-excitation of electron occur it comes to a high potential energy state than the ground state that is called meta stable state By Raman zada
It means bond is very stable or strong.
Bond forming releases energy. Atoms will begin with a high potential energy, and will bond with other atoms to form compounds which have a lower potential energy, and are therefore more stable. Bond breaking takes in energy i.e. energy is required to break bonds.
Based on a electromagnetic core in a vortex of spunningliquid mercury with a stable electrically charged energy.
The energy is in the movement of the air. Generally the higher you go into the troposphere the more energy is in the faster and stable winds. Wind power generation plants are placed where there is a lot of stable wind and close to infrastructure (electric grids, backup power sources, etc).
1)Energy will be released. 2)In the reaction-coordinate vs potential energy graph reactants will have more energy than that of products(which will be at the minimum energy and also highly stable.) 3)ΔH = −value(KJ/mol)