No. While they have no actual relation, Edward; Emmett; and Alice share a surname while Jasper and Rosalie do as well. Obviously enough they pose as siblings to seem more human. On ther contrary Esme, Carlisle, Edward, Emmett, and Rosalie are linked by venom because Carlisle changed them making Bella in a way linked as well. The only blood relation on the entire Cullen family is Renesmee and Bella and Edward.
No, none of the Cullens are actually siblings. They are all adopted from different families, and at different times.
Nope.
no one had siblings as vampires before being adopted into the Cullen family. Alice had a human sibling before she was turned into a vampire. a younger sister. (she doesn't discover this until one of the sequels, not sure which one). She has a niece who is living. The books don't mention any other siblings for the other Cullens or the Hales
Yes edward ,alice, emmett,jasper,roslie are all adopted
Actually, George Lucas has no siblings: he is an only child
it is jasper hale, rosealie hale, Edward Cullen, emmet Cullen, and Alice Cullen,
The siblings,actually,the step siblings of harpies are auras,wind nymphs who are spirits of summer breezes.
Vampire LegendsThe Original Answer above is wrong its actuallyQuileute Legendsas Bella only realises after she looks at the legends that the Cullens may be Vampires.* Actually the answer that Bella searches on google aboutEdward is cold ones.... but I actually dont know what she searched when she was talking to Jacob
no they are no the cullens they are sams/jacobs pack no of course not!!! but im not telling you anymore then that. just read the book. its way better then looking up spoilers on the internet
9 cullens
Irina did betray the Cullens by telling the Voluri that the Cullens had a vampire child.
Alice found jasper (because of her special gift of visions/second sight) and they both went to the Cullens together because Alice had seen it them go in one of her visions. Your right but, Eward were the first teenager who joined the cullens