Want this question answered?
The conclusion of non-conventional sources of energy is that they offer a viable, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective alternative to conventional sources of energy. Non-conventional sources of energy have the potential to significantly reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and reduce harmful emissions, making them a key part of the global effort to tackle climate change. Additionally, non-conventional sources of energy—such as solar, wind, hydropower, and geothermal—are generally renewable, meaning they can continue to be used indefinitely with minimal environmental impact. As technology advances, the cost of non-conventional sources of energy is becoming more competitive with conventional sources, making them more attractive for both residential and commercial applications.
You try to find new sources of energy so that if one day, the source of energy we use runs out, we will have an alternative. Also, some of the energy we use today has a bad effect to our environment and if people find new sources of energy that are possibly better than what we use currently, we will be saving the earth and using less cost if the new source of energy is cheap.
what is origin of non-renewable energy sources, including how energy became trapped in these souces
It does not work at night or in cloudy weather. It is not cost effective. Most solar panels cost a lot of money. You get more energy per dollar from wind turbines than from solar panels.
How about: 'Energy sources are essential for an industrial economy'
Cost. If there was an alternative that was cost effective the free market would embrace it. Unfortunately there is no cost effective solution. Hold on to your wallets because the solution will be to raise current energy costs to "level" it with more expensive "renewable" sources.
yeh
The conclusion of non-conventional sources of energy is that they offer a viable, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective alternative to conventional sources of energy. Non-conventional sources of energy have the potential to significantly reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and reduce harmful emissions, making them a key part of the global effort to tackle climate change. Additionally, non-conventional sources of energy—such as solar, wind, hydropower, and geothermal—are generally renewable, meaning they can continue to be used indefinitely with minimal environmental impact. As technology advances, the cost of non-conventional sources of energy is becoming more competitive with conventional sources, making them more attractive for both residential and commercial applications.
yes there is a need for cost effective power supply like solar energy
It does not pollute and is a very cost-effective energy source.
LG brand is considered the most cost effective and energy efficient brand for washers and dryers.
This is a world-wide problem not confined to any particular country; it exists because the cost of non-renewable energy sources is, so far, significantly less than the cost of renewable sources.
It is a proven fact that solar energy is more efficient and cost effective over the long run.
Energy is not renewable. The sources to make that energy may be. After the initial cost of plant and equipment some sources are practically free so the only costs are maintenance costs..
It made production of goods faster and more effective.
The advantages is that non renewable energy cost less and it's always available.
pancake pancake pack's and animal duckier Hector pew