All theories don't become laws because of several reasons, most notably the notion that anybody can come up with a theory before having sufficient proof to back it up.
Remember that one of the first few steps of the scientific method is to formulate a hypothesis. Regardless of the hypothesis' correctness, it is still a theory which may or may not become true. Rigorous testing and examination must prove it to be true. Many theories in science especially conflict with one another, but the laws are universal to my understanding.
For example, the law of universal gravitation is accepted everywhere because it has been tested quiet a bit (without which we would not have entered space). However, many theories such as those that examine how the earth was created are still subject to intense speculation--was it the Big Bang, God, evil robotic aliens?
So there you have it.
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all
A model is an explanation of why an event occurs, and how data and events are related. So theories and hypothesis are testable statements and broad generalizations to compare data and to collect data.
Learning in the natural world does not start with memorizing scientific laws and theories. It starts with the child exploring those facts while playing.
Laws are made when it is true and Poven true like the law of motion. they're like they can't be changed , it is there , nothing could stop it . Theories are made when something like "a damp cloth will dry off if it falls from 8000ft" Theories are like SAYINGS or Myths . so LAWS are 100% WILL HAPPEN , but Theories are like 50-50
Laws have been proven, theories have not
Laws have been proven, theories have not
all theories don't become laws
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
the laws of motion
In the scientific context, theories and laws serve different purposes. Theories are overarching explanations supported by a large body of evidence, while laws are concise statements describing natural phenomena. Theories do not "become" laws; they complement each other by providing explanations and descriptions in science.
"Laws" are just simplified descriptions of theories.
all theories don't become laws
Laws differ from theories because laws describe observed patterns in nature or society, based on empirical evidence, while theories provide explanations and interpretations of these patterns. Laws do not provide the underlying mechanisms or reasons why these patterns exist, which is the function of a theory.
Theories never become laws. Theories explain facts and scientific observations; laws describe the behavior of an object in nature. A scientific law explains what will happen, but it doesn't explain why. Theories explain why.
Laws are consistent observations and always happen Theories are attempts to explain why certain laws are true.
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all