All theories don't become laws because of several reasons, most notably the notion that anybody can come up with a theory before having sufficient proof to back it up.
Remember that one of the first few steps of the scientific method is to formulate a hypothesis. Regardless of the hypothesis' correctness, it is still a theory which may or may not become true. Rigorous testing and examination must prove it to be true. Many theories in science especially conflict with one another, but the laws are universal to my understanding.
For example, the law of universal gravitation is accepted everywhere because it has been tested quiet a bit (without which we would not have entered space). However, many theories such as those that examine how the earth was created are still subject to intense speculation--was it the Big Bang, God, evil robotic aliens?
So there you have it.
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all
A model is an explanation of why an event occurs, and how data and events are related. So theories and hypothesis are testable statements and broad generalizations to compare data and to collect data.
In science, laws are concise statements that describe consistent and universal observations, often expressed mathematically, such as Newton's laws of motion. Theories, on the other hand, are comprehensive explanations of phenomena that are supported by extensive evidence and can encompass multiple laws; they provide a framework for understanding how and why things happen, like the theory of evolution. While laws predict what will happen under certain conditions, theories explain how and why those outcomes occur.
Learning in the natural world does not start with memorizing scientific laws and theories. It starts with the child exploring those facts while playing.
Theories and laws serve different purposes in science. Theories are explanations that integrate and explain data from various observations, while laws are concise descriptions of a particular phenomenon. Theories are more comprehensive and can be modified or refined with new evidence, whereas laws are typically more general and do not change. Thus, theories are not elevated to laws but can support them.
Laws have been proven, theories have not
all theories don't become laws
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
the laws of motion
In the scientific context, theories and laws serve different purposes. Theories are overarching explanations supported by a large body of evidence, while laws are concise statements describing natural phenomena. Theories do not "become" laws; they complement each other by providing explanations and descriptions in science.
Laws describe observed phenomena and relationships in nature, while theories explain why those phenomena occur based on tested hypotheses and evidence. Laws are more descriptive and specific, while theories are broader and provide a framework for understanding natural phenomena.
Scientific theories usually come before scientific laws. Theories are comprehensive explanations of a wide range of observations and data, while laws are concise statements describing specific relationships or patterns within a system. Theories often precede the formulation of laws as they help to understand and predict natural phenomena before they can be distilled into succinct laws.
"Laws" are just simplified descriptions of theories.
all theories don't become laws
Theories never become laws. Theories explain facts and scientific observations; laws describe the behavior of an object in nature. A scientific law explains what will happen, but it doesn't explain why. Theories explain why.
Laws are consistent observations and always happen Theories are attempts to explain why certain laws are true.