No , there are no amphibians there .
Tasmanian devils are marsupials of Australia.
Harold G. Cogger has written: 'Reptiles & Amphibians' -- subject(s): reptiles, amphibians 'Reptiles & Amphibians of Australia' -- subject(s): Reptiles, Amphibians 'New lizards of the genus Pseudothecadactylus (Lacertilia, Gekkonidae) from Arnhem Land and Northwestern Australia' -- subject(s): Pseudothecadactylus lindneri, Reptiles 'Reptiles & Amphibians' -- subject(s): reptiles, amphibians 'Animals and their young' -- subject(s): Animals, Juvenile literature, Infancy
Pretty sure amphibians do not see any colors.
no
According to Australia's Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (see the related link below), there are currently 227 described species of amphibians in Australia. Not one of them is a toad, as Australia has no true native toads. Nor does it have salamanders, newts or axolotls. Amphibians of Australia are limited to members of the order Anura, commonly known as frogs. All Australian frogs are in the suborder Neobatrachia, also known as the modern frogs, which make up the largest proportion of extant frog species.
yes?
No, amphibians don't need milk. Since they can't produce any, they wouldn't have survived if they needed any.
Yes! there's more venomous Amphibians than Reptiles.
The dingo (Canis lupus dingo) is a feral dog native to Australia. The dingot is a mammal, not an amphibian.
Means amphibians don't have hair/fur,scales,or any type of skin.
The term 'dinosaurs' refer to any of numerous extinct terrestrial reptiles of the Mesozoic era - ergo, they were not amphibians.