yes
They didn't. Earthquakes generally don't need any help. no. it means how did the united nations help the people after the earthquake
The Secondary or S-wave.
Yes.
Is it f d a approved
It was the Indian and Arabian plate. Do'nt know if they were subduction, convergent, or spreading.
Presently we do not have any way to moderate an earthquake. What we do is try to make any structures we build safer and more capable of resisting the effects of an earthquake.
muzamil ibrahim from kashmir
The Kashmir, India earthquake was a disaster in 2005. The Kohistan, Pakistan avalanche was a disaster in 2010. The Kolka-Karmadon rock-ice slide in Russia was a disaster in 2002.
An earthquake can definitely cause the world damage. In areas unprepared for earthquakes, it can cause massive damage to buildings and also kill people.
An epicentre in a volcano is where the whole volcano erupted and when the primary and secondary effects started
Seismologists attempt to quantify the risk posed by a particular fault zone rather than state exactly when an earthquake will occur (as this is currently impossible).For more information, please see the related question.Yes Kashmir was predicted an earthquake but scientists predicted an atrocious earthquake which would wipe out most of India. But it gave the strength of 7.6 on the Richter scale which was less than they feared
Normally it doesn't. Any change in water level is secondary to the earthquake that causes (most) tsunamis and/or the rise or fall of the land that accompanies it.