Want this question answered?
No. Bacteria are classified as prokaryotic. Eukaryotes have differing traits from prokaryotes - most notably they have nuclei where prokaryotes do not have nuclei. Viruses are classified as neither prokaryotic or eukaryotic but are considered to be living organisms as well.
Viruses depend on living cells because they reproduce inside of them.
Ebola is NOT a eukaryote. Ebola is NOT a prokaryote. Ebola IS a VIRUS. ALL Viruses are NOT considered either prokaryotes or eukaryotes because they lack the characteristics of living things - (except the ability to replicate and to do that they have to hijack another living cell).
Ebola is NOT a eukaryote. Ebola is NOT a prokaryote. Ebola IS a VIRUS. ALL Viruses are NOT considered either prokaryotes or eukaryotes because they lack the characteristics of living things - (except the ability to replicate and to do that they have to hijack another living cell).
110
Yes. Viruses are living things too.
Yes, all living things are made up of cells :)
The difference is that viruses are smaller than bacteria. One more major difference is that bacteria are living things whereas viruses are non living things.
Viruses are not living things. Viruses are complicated assemblies of molecules, including proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and carbohydrates, but on their own they can do nothing until they enter a living cell. Without cells, viruses would not be able to multiply. Therefore, viruses are not living things.
viruses are nonliving things. but they need living things to reproduces. so live
viruses do not grow, and viruses do not respond to changes in their environment. Therefore, viruses are not living organisms. All living things reproduce, but Viruses need living cells to reproduce because Viruses cannot reproduce by themselves.
Everything that are living are living organisms. Every other things are not considered to be a living organism e.g. viruses.