Yes. The higher the human population, the more land is developed and more habitat is lost.
Arctic wolves population is affected because people think they are either going to hurt them or kill them so the humans kill the wolves. But the part we dont understand is that wolves are similar to humans. For an example: We put are names on our stuff to tell people it is theres well wolves mark there territory for the same reason. So see wolves are simialer but wolves express differently than humans.
Wolves have affected nearly every organism in Yellowstone. Watch the video to see how.
Wolves, as far as we know, are not affected by global warming.
If the number of wolves increased, then the population of caribou would decrease. Wolves are a predator of the caribou, so the population of the caribou would drop if more wolves were around.
There are about 150,000 wolves left in the world. They used to be at a large risk for extinction, but they are steadily increasing in population.
There are a couple of animal populations that were not affected by an increase is the krill population. Cobras were not affected.
Population distribution is usually greatly affected by what?
The decline of moose population followed sooner or later by a decline in the wolves population because the is less for the wolves.
Gamma rays can effect all organic materials including wolves. Why did u think wolves wudnt be affected? lol wow
if would the polar bear population be affected if crustacean population increases will be die or will be worm it in to body be affected to the population of the polar bear
there was lords who controoled them
The increased deer population is the cause and the increased wolf population is the effect (more deer means more food for the wolves, which enables their population to increase).