Are you sure that a Judge can commit perjury or forge a document in a judicial proceeding and enjoy immunity?

Answer 1

I say that no such immunity exists. The backbone of American Law is that 1 false statement advanced under oath is perjury and if the person who receives this false information does not strike it down then the "two" form a conspiracy. The accuser swears he will pass evidence to the Judge in open Court. If, for instance, the Judge "knows" the evidence is fabricated and he accepts it as true then he forms a conspiracy with the accuser. The wisdom of the system is witnessed in that the accuser swears he will make the guilt of the defendant "evident" to the Court. If the process is poisoned with false evidence or an improper process then the "evidence" sword, which cuts both ways, makes the "conspiracy" between the "accuser" and the Judge "evident". This "evident" conspiracy will grow even larger on appeal when 5 more Judges and Appeals Court clerks "witness" the false move "on the record" causing the conspiracy to grow larger and make it even more "evident" The free press also has access to the Public records and their integrity and credibility goes on the line should they fail to disclose the unfair trial. So, in summary, either the guilt of the defendant is "evident", OR, the fact that the defendant did not receive a fair trial will become "evident" and obvious by the documented facts in the record. Naturally, should any matter be "too close to call" then the defendant would be the beneficiary of any such doubt. "Better 40 guilty men go free than 1 innocent man be convicted." Richard J Wojick rwoj888@gmail.com