If it were pointing toward a divine creation, it would also be pointing to the complete irrelevance of faith. This would be a serious if not insurmountable problem for some faith-based systems. What is the need for faith when confronted with concrete evidence? On the other hand, no amount of science however widely expanded it is can ever disprove creation. So there isn't much evidence of a changing pointer. However, the expansion of discovery may be pointing away from the authoritative position of the accepted creation accounts in the scriptures of some faiths.
The scientific discoveries themselves point neither toward nor away from divine creation. The interpretations that are placed on the discoveries by most scientists point away from God. For other scientists, the same discoveries either indicate an unspecified supernatural origin to life or specifically point to creation of life by God.
That depends upon whom you ask. Each school of thought will say that everything fits their viewpoint or proves it outright. See also:
Is there evidence for Creation?
It's not that scientists are actually seeking to prove that divine creation did not really happen, but each new scientific advance shows divine involvement in the creation of life to be unnecessary.
Knowledge creation involves generating new information or insights through research or innovation processes. Knowledge discovery involves finding existing knowledge that was previously unknown or hidden, often through data analysis or exploration. In essence, knowledge creation involves producing new knowledge, while knowledge discovery involves uncovering existing knowledge.
Scientific knowledge vs. the creation of life.
Victor promised to reveal the secret of life and the creation of a new being through his scientific experiments. He aimed to uncover the mysteries of life and death, challenging the boundaries of human knowledge and understanding.
science creates knowledge, knowledge allows the creation of working technology, technology that works changes the world Without science, our "knowledge" would be filled with unreality and technology created from the errors would not work.
Its because they are zones/areas of new crustal formation/creation.
Plate movements.
Robert Michael Kopke has written: 'The scientific discovery of the creation force' -- subject(s): Force and energy, Miscellanea, Physics, Reality, Simplicity (Philosophy)
There is no scientific theory of creation.
There is no scientific proof of a biblical creation. That is a matter of faith alone. The scientific consensus is that the universe came about as a result of an event popularly called the "Big Bang" which occurred around 13.7 billion years ago.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
it was the societies make the knowledge creation of influenced them
Knowledge conversion in Nonaka's model occurs through socialization (tacit to tacit), externalization (tacit to explicit), combination (explicit to explicit), and internalization (explicit to tacit). These modes involve different processes of sharing, articulating, and transferring knowledge between individuals and organizations, facilitating the creation of new knowledge.
Day of Discovery - 1968 The Wonder of Creation Soil The Foundation of Life was released on: USA: 9 November 2008