0
If you can't back up your argument with evidence, then your argument can't be proven as fact. Therefore, there is little use in arguing in the first place.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are smaller arguments that in turn help support the thesis?
Smaller arguments are specific points or pieces of evidence that support the overall thesis statement. They provide more detailed explanations or examples that back up the main argument and help strengthen the overall message of the thesis.
What is it that makes an argument inductive?
An argument is inductive if its premises provide evidence that supports the conclusion but does not guarantee its truth. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. The strength of an inductive argument depends on the quality and relevance of the evidence provided.
You find that there are compelling arguments for opposing arguments in response to your research question what can you do?
Incorporate the opposing arguments into your research to provide a more comprehensive analysis. Address the opposing arguments with counterarguments backed by evidence to strengthen your research. Acknowledge the validity of the opposing arguments while highlighting the strengths of your own research.
What are presumptive arguments based on?
Presumptive arguments are based on plausibility, which is whether a statement seems true in normal situations. The conclusion from the argument is tentatively acceptable if the premises are true. However, presumptive or plausible reasoning give way to inductive arguments. It is easy in this sort of argument to be wrong when new evidence is discovered.
How do you identify arguments?
Arguments can be identified by looking for statements or claims presented with the intent to persuade or convince others. They typically involve a main claim, supported by reasons or evidence, and may include counterarguments to address opposing viewpoints. Identifying keywords like "because," "therefore," or "since" can also help pinpoint arguments in a text or conversation.
What are the arguments for and against DNA evidence?
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
Who had better results and conclusion out of lamarck and Darwin?
Darwin, of course. Lamarck did not have the evidence to back up his acquired characteristics and use and disuse concepts, but Darwin had massive amounts of evidence and well structured arguments for his theory of natural selection.
Why do writer's use evidence in their writing?
They use evidence to support their arguments.
How do you use the word countervail in a sentence?
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
How did the speaker address arguments and counterarguments?
A speaker addresses arguments and counterarguments by providing his or her own arguments. The speaker will have to provide evidence that supports his or her own arguments.
What do you do in a group debate?
In a group debate, listen actively to others, take turns speaking, present your arguments clearly and confidently, back up your points with evidence or examples, and be respectful of others' viewpoints even if you disagree.
What is it that makes an argument inductive?
An argument is inductive if its premises provide evidence that supports the conclusion but does not guarantee its truth. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. The strength of an inductive argument depends on the quality and relevance of the evidence provided.
Why is it important to build grassroots for a party?
So you can have standing arguments to back you up
Scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Yes it is true that scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence. For a hypothesis to have value, it must be testable is true also.
Why is it important to build grassroots to support for a party?
So you can have standing arguments to back you up
What evidence is used to refute the theory of evolution?
There is no evidence that refutes the theory of evolution by natural selection. Critiques and arguments by creationist and ID advocates are always poorly thought out and easily shown to be wrong by even undergraduates. The arguments use straw men and other fallacies plus they have been refuted so many times that to bring one of these arguments up is to self parody.
What evidence is used to refute theory of evolution?
There is no evidence that refutes the theory of evolution by natural selection. Critiques and arguments by creationist and ID advocates are always poorly thought out and easily shown to be wrong by even undergraduates. The arguments use straw men and other fallacies plus they have been refuted so many times that to bring one of these arguments up is to self parody.
