answersLogoWhite

0

Based on no reliable evidence

User Avatar

Anonymous

16y ago
Updated: 8/17/2019

ill founded

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Which method separates modern historians from ancient Greek historians?

Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence


What made alchemy unscientific in its practice?

It was not based on evidence and experiment. - Alex Learning


How reliable is DNA fingerprinting?

It is not infallable, but it is considered reliable enough to be use as evidence.


What is evidence derived from one or more of the five senses?

Empirical evidence is evidence that is obtained through observation or experimentation using the five senses. This evidence is based on direct sensory experience and is considered objective and reliable in scientific research and investigation.


What is An argument supported by research and strong evidence?

An argument that is supported by research and strong evidence is one that is based on credible sources, data, and studies that back up the claims being made. This type of argument is more persuasive and reliable because it is not just based on opinions or beliefs, but on concrete evidence that has been thoroughly researched and analyzed.


What kind of evidence is finger printing?

Fingerprinting is a form of biometric evidence that can be used to uniquely identify individuals based on the patterns of ridges and furrows on their fingertips. It is a reliable method for linking a person to a crime scene or a particular object.


What is an answer to an evidence based question called?

The answer to an evidence based question is called 'proof'.


Does circumstantial evidence hold up in court as a reliable form of proof?

Circumstantial evidence can be considered reliable in court, but it may not be as strong as direct evidence. It can still be used to prove a case if it is convincing and points to a logical conclusion.


Why is it important to differentiate between evidence fact and knowledge based opinions in reports?

Differentiating between evidence and knowledge-based opinions helps ensure the credibility and accuracy of the information presented in reports. Evidence-based facts are verifiable and support the conclusions drawn, while knowledge-based opinions are subjective interpretations that may vary depending on the individual's perspective. By clearly defining these distinctions, reports can provide a more balanced and reliable assessment of the topic at hand.


What does it mean for scientific evidence to be objective?

For scientific evidence to be objective, it means that it is based on observations and data that are independent of personal beliefs or biases. It should be reproducible and verifiable by multiple independent researchers. This helps ensure that the evidence is reliable and accurate.


Scientist are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?

Logos refers to the process of persuading a person or group using supportive evidence. A researcher must conduct experiments using the scientific method, and generate reliable and valid results


When a source for evidence is not convincing or reliable it is to be considered what?

When a source for evidence is not convincing or reliable, it should be considered unreliable or questionable. It is important to verify information from credible sources to ensure accuracy and authenticity.