True/yes
the two major parties are often described as though they were highly organized, close knit, well disciplined groups. neither party is anything of the kind, both are highly decentralized, fragmented, disjointed, and often beset by factions and internal squabbling. (Federalism, the nominating process)
the two major parties are often described as though they were highly organized, close knit, well disciplined groups. neither party is anything of the kind, both are highly decentralized, fragmented, disjointed, and often beset by factions and internal squabbling. (Federalism, the nominating process)
yes
Political parties in the U.S. are highly decentralized and "weak" (according to most political scientists). This is likely because of the primary system combined with a first-past-the-post electoral system, in which voters from individual districts choose the nominee for each party. This allows voters to choose who most reflect their values (like pro-gun, anti-abortion Democrats in the South). In the UK, where the parties are much stronger and more centralized, the leadership of the parties choose the nominees for each district -- the voters get no say. This lends itself to party members falling in line with the wants of the party leaders much more. John McCain and Arlen Specter are basically impossible in the UK.
A decentralized politcal system
decentralized government
You must have the consent of both parties in writing.You must have the consent of both parties in writing.You must have the consent of both parties in writing.You must have the consent of both parties in writing.
The third parties have played a significant role in the strengthening of our two major parties.
The third parties have played a significant role in the strengthening of our two major parties.
Both Parties Concerned was created in 1944.
what a decentralized kitchen and how a decentralized kitchen
Decentralized