answersLogoWhite

0

By taking policy making, the court asserted a type of judicial philosophy known as judicial review.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Which policy making body work to make the federal judicial system run smoothly and follow standardized procedures?

(Judicial Conference)


Opposition to the judiciary's creative policy making role is a consistent tenet of judicial what?

restraint


The quasi-judicial policy-making power of bureacratic agencies is called what?

administrative adjudication


Opposition to the judiciary's creative policy making role is a consistent tenet of judicial?

restraint


What is the term for the philosophy US Supreme Court justices should make government policy?

Judicial activismFor more information, see Related Questions, below.


What is Attitudinal model of judicial decision making?

The attitudinal model of judicial decision making is a model which theorizes that justices make decisions based on policy preferences kind of like politicians do, basically that they let their own opinions and morals guide their decisions.


A partys what contains its philosophy principles and policy positions?

A party's platform contains its philosophy, principles, and policy positions.


Does the supreme court makes the majority of American judicial policy?

No. Only the tiniest fraction of American judicial policy is made by the Supreme Court.


What was the bourbon monarchs policy?

The July Monarchy early asserted that the policy would be that of the "golden mean," neither conservative nor radical, but moderate.


Why is judicial involvement in policy issues controversial?

2. Judicial involvement in policy issues so controversial because each judge interprets the constitution in different way and sometimes they can do it for public benefit. They can choose to be judge base on judicial restraint or judicial activist.


Who was Mary Lease and what policy positions did she support?

philosophy, principles, and policy positions


Was Judicial Activism or Judicial Restraint used in the Tinker v Des Moines case?

Judicial activism was used because the Court ruled that the school policy prohibiting the students from wearing the arm bands to protest symbolically the Vietnam War violated the students' free speech rights. By overturning a policy of the government (the public school's policy), the Court exercised judicial activism.