Friderich Miescher
Too broad a question to answer here. It all depends on the type(s) of evidence being collected and the conditions to which it has been exposed.
No, hair is not interchangeably used to describe DNA. However, hair is a source for DNA this is why when forensic scientists are involved in crime scenes, they look for any sample of which contains DNA, including hair.
It depends on the data you collected. There is NO way to figure out if the DNA samples were the same, without the actual data.
Because it need to preserve for DNA expert to use. Just like all the living things if an animals is died in snow, snow are used to preserve them. Same as DNA
Yes, DNA can still be collected after embalming, although the process may reduce the overall quantity and quality of the genetic material. Common areas to collect DNA from after embalming include bones, teeth, and hair roots. It's important to work with a professional experienced in post-mortem DNA collection to ensure the best possible results.
mitochondrial sample
you get 1 DNA for every 8 eggs collected/critters eaten, so rainin lizards is a good speedrun for getting lots of DNA.
No, it can only be used to generate a DNA profile.
Because DNA is unchangeable, the date it's collected is irrelevant. It can be collected within an hour or in thrity years; it's still the same DNA. Testing methods and handling of the samples can affect the test results.
It can be used to identify the criminals easily if the criminal's hair sample or blood sample is collected and comparing it with the DNA of the suspects
dudi
Friedrich Miescher
i think ladders are good as
Friedrich Miescher
Friedrich Miescher
The Incus, Malleus and Stapes are the bones of the middle ear. They are the smallest bones in the human body. The three bones are connected by hinges and are levers that carry the vibrations collected from the ear drum to the middle ear