Absolutely no. As the desert occupied almost 9.1 million square kilometer (3.5 million square miles) it is impossible to make whole of the desert in green.
Firstly, it is due to its soil content. The desert are totally consist of sand of 0.2-2 mm in diameter and this just cannot allow the trees to grow. The reason is that there are no water reservoir among the soil particles as it easily leached. Furthermore, if water is supplied, the sand can choke or suffocated the trees. We can apply the organic material to the desert but are we willing to collect or dig just to cover the Sahara?
Secondly, if we CAN control the climate, then we may have an opportunity to survive in Sahara. The temperature and rainfall in Sahara just not adequate to even the Sahara itself.
However, there a a small parts in the desert that are able to be an agriculture activities which the water reservoirs (oasis) is there.
Take a note, we just cannot make Sahara green, but Sahara taking the green parts of the adjacent area.
the Sahara desert was made around 4.6 billion years ago when the earth was created.
no
Camels
The green plant is the base of the chain because it is a producer. The grasshopper could be called primary consumer of the plant. The turkey is the secondary consumer of the grasshopper. The human is the tertiary consumer of the turkey.
How the Earth Was Made - 2009 Sahara 2-4 is rated/received certificates of: Australia:G
No, the Sahara desert was made by the weather in Africa.
Weathered rock
Sahara 4000 made by shimano
Yes, most of the sand is made of weathered rock.
camels
The first is that minerals are natural, made without human intervention. Second, minerals are solid. Third, minerals are inorganic. Fourth, minerals are crystalline in composition.
Yes, the sand in the Sahara is either bright yellow/ beige or in some places red; although only 1/8th of the Sahara is sand, the balance is rock