No. Although it may not make economic sense, she does not have to work.
Until recently custody decisions were based almost solely on the?
Child support, is based on the needs of the child and the economic situation of the parents. Child support is primarily determined by what it takes to provide the child with a reasonable standard of living, based on what the two divorced parents have available. Sole custody indicates that the child will be living solely (with limited visitation) with a just one of the parents. Thus, that parent will be responsible for providing the vast majority of the food, clothes, etc. that the child will be using. The non-custodial parent now no longer will be providing those (if they had shared custody). So it is likely that the court will also modify the child support requirement - either reducing the amount the custodial parent had been paying the now non-custodial parent, or increasing the amount that the now non-custodial parent had been paying the now custodial parent.
The biological father of a child always has the right to sue for custody of his child. Whether his immigration status will cause problems for him being awarded custody and or being allowed to stay in the country is a totally separate issue however. Solely based on the best interests of the child if the mother is truly abusive or neglectful the father should intervene in order to protect the child, irregardless of his legal status. While he may be deported and unable to obtain custody himself the state will assess the child's living situation and move to protect the child if it is appropriate.
Under the law, sexual orientation is not a factor in custody disputes; however, in practice, Texas Judges will sometimes award custody to the straight parent solely on the basis of their orientation.
If the couple is married they both have equal parental rights. In Virginia, an unmarried mother is presumed to have custody. Once the paternity of the father has been established legally through the court he can request custody. The court will make a determination of physical custody based solely on the best interest of the child. See related link for more information.
No
If the father terminates his parental rights the single mother can legally and solely have full custody of that child as long as the courts decide that she is capable of working and providing a safe environment for the child. There are times that the parents of the young mother, or possibly grandparents will help in looking after the child if the mother is a minor and finishing her education and the courts will often look favorably on this.
Unfortunately, you still have to pay if these are her grandparents. It is up to the grandparents to suggest to her that she pay something towards the children. If they are your grandparents then they can seek legal council and demand she too pay child support. If she is living with the grandparents and raising your child then it is solely up to the grandparents to decide if they foot the bill or she does. Sorry. Marcy
If a stepparent has not legally adopted a non biological child, then he or she has no legal right to make any decision concerning the child. If the mother retains full custody of the minor the decision can be made solely by her as long as such a decision is not contrary to existing laws of the resident state. If there is joint custody between the two biological parents, the parent with whom the child does not reside would have to file suit to prevent the minor from moving in with a significant other.
Not solely due to her age, but a 17-year-old who is making bad judgments about parenting or who has no financial resources to properly care for a child can easily lose custody.
Mitochondrial DNA comes solely from the mother. Mom contributes more than dad.
Imperialism.