No, that would be a violation, and the debtor should be able to recover damages for it. The debtor does have to file a motion for damages, however.
If relief from automatic stay has been lifted against you, the creditor may now proceed to collect the debt.
Then the secured creditor would most likely foreclose on the property.
If the automatic stay is lifted and no foreclosure has been filed, one just needs filed as normal. If the foreclosure was already filed and the automatic stay was lifted, the creditor simply informs the Court with the foreclosure that the stay was lifted and the case will resume. Speak with an attorney about your specific situation. If you can not find an attorney, contact your local Bar association and they will refer you to one.
AnswerAn automatic stay stops creditors from proceeding against you, either garnishing wages or siezing property. I think after the automatic stay is lifted, the creditor requesting that the stay is lifted, can proceed against you for the item they want back.Once the stay is lifted [granted] by the Bankruptcy Court, the creditor is free to take whatever action is appropriate to recover and sell the property. If the debtor is granted a discharge in bankruptcy, the debtor will not be required to pay to the creditor any deficiency amount that results if the sale of the collateral does not generate enough money to pay the debt in full.Further it also depends on how you respond after lifting of stay, if you do not make any payment, creditor may continue with his course of action. It is always better filing proper reply to the motion to lift the automatic stay.An experienced Attorney would assist you in all these aspects.
Yes, a creditor can garnish wages even if a levy was lifted on the account. This would require a judgment and the court documents.
A creditor can ask for anything. The question really is whether or not it is likely that the request will be granted. I assume since you have made all of your payments per the plan, you have proof of such in the form of cancelled checks, bank statements, money order receipts, etc. If the payments are going to the trustee and then to the creditor, then you should find out whether or not the trustee has released the money to the creditor. Now, what you will need to do is hire a lawyer to file an objection to the motion for relief of stay and take your proof with you. It is unlikely that the stay will be lifted, however, you should not assume that it won't and do nothing.
The brides veil is lifted right before the kiss
when automatic stay is lifted what can occur to the debtor?
A secured creditor does not need to file a such a claim, the lien against the property is sufficient proof. Generally the lien holder/lender will ask for the automatic stay to be lifted so foreclosure or repossession action can continue or be implemented against the property. In a chapter 7 bankruptcy the borrower must be able to reaffirm the secured debt to avoid recovery or litigation action from the lender.
More than likely the lender has not requested as yet had the BK stay lifted. If a secured creditor does not receive permission to be excluded from the BK they must wait until the discharge is final before proceeding with repossession action. No, the borrower does not get to "keep" the vehicle unless they are able to reaffirm the loan with the lender.
yes i am 12 and i have been lifted off the ground my a boy my age i am 64 pounds
PROBABLY if one is in a Chapter 13 and the stay is lifted, that debtor can convert to Chapter 7 and then re-file another Chapter 13 after the Chapter 7 discharge and reinstate the stay against the creditor who had the stay lifted in the prior Chapter 13. I say "probably" rather than "yes" for a few reasons: (1) Because the creditor could object to the new Chapter 13 and argue that the debtor is abusing the Bankruptcy Code, an argument the Court may or may not be swayed by; (2) If a debtor voluntarily dismisses a Chapter 13 once a Motion for Relief from Stay has been filed in the Chapter 13 case, that debtor is automatically barred from re-filing another Chapter 13 for 180 days (see 11 U.S.C. 109(g)(2)). So, the creditor may argue that conversion to Chapter 7 is akin to voluntary dismissal and so the debtor should be barred from filing another Chapter 13 for 180 days (I have no idea if such an argument would work for the creditor); and (3) Different districts may have different case law affecting the answer to this question, so it's probably best to consult a lawyer in your area. Please note that nothing in this posting or in any other posting constitutes legal advice; this is simply my understanding of the facts, which I do not warrant, and I am not suggesting any course of action or inaction to any person.