answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Sure, you count the apples in a basket, for example. Inductively, you found that there are five. Now, if you were to give an answer as to one of them being a part of a set of all the apples in a basket, you would have to say that it is a part of a set consisting of five apples.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

3d ago

No, an inductive argument cannot be changed into a deductive argument because they are fundamentally different types of reasoning. Inductive arguments rely on probability and generalizations to support their conclusions, while deductive arguments rely on logic and specific premises to guarantee their conclusions.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can a inductive argument be changed into a deductive argument?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

What is more common inductive argument or deductive argument?

Deductive arguments are more common than inductive arguments. Deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and applies it to a specific case, leading to a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations and generates a general hypothesis.


Is the ontological argument deductive or inductive?

The ontological argument is typically considered a deductive argument. It aims to establish the existence of God by reason alone, starting from the concept of God as a necessary being. It proceeds through logical steps to demonstrate that God's existence is a necessary consequence of His definition.


How do you formulate a deductive or inductive argument?

For a deductive argument, you start with a general premise and apply it to a specific case to reach a certain conclusion. In contrast, an inductive argument begins with specific observations and generalizes to a broader theory or principle. Both types aim to support a conclusion with appropriate reasoning and logic.


An argument in which the author presents a general conclusion before listing observed specifics is what type of argument?

An argument in which the author presents a general conclusion before listing observed specifics is an inductive argument. Inductive reasoning involves moving from specific observations to broader generalizations or conclusions.


What are Deductive and Inductive argument means?

Deductive reasoning is drawing a specific conclusion from general principles or premises that are known to be true. It aims to provide certainty in the conclusion. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves making generalizations or probabilistic conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. It aims to provide strong support for the conclusion without guaranteeing absolute certainty.

Related questions

What are Deductive and Inductive argument means?

Deductive reasoning is drawing a specific conclusion from general principles or premises that are known to be true. It aims to provide certainty in the conclusion. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves making generalizations or probabilistic conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. It aims to provide strong support for the conclusion without guaranteeing absolute certainty.


What is more common inductive argument or deductive argument?

Deductive arguments are more common than inductive arguments. Deductive reasoning begins with a general statement and applies it to a specific case, leading to a certain conclusion. Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations and generates a general hypothesis.


Is the ontological argument deductive or inductive?

The ontological argument is typically considered a deductive argument. It aims to establish the existence of God by reason alone, starting from the concept of God as a necessary being. It proceeds through logical steps to demonstrate that God's existence is a necessary consequence of His definition.


How is inductive reasoning different from deductive reasoning?

Inductive reasoning varies from deductive reasoning as follows: 1) inductive reasoning is a reason supporting an argument and 2) deductive reasoning is an argument against an argument.


What are the 4 fundamentals of logic?

Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy


An argument that starts from a more specific idea to reach a more general conclusion is known as?

inductive-reasoning


Which law allows you to state a conclusion from two true conditional statements?

Syllogism, logic (deductive or inductive).Syllogism, logic (deductive or inductive).Syllogism, logic (deductive or inductive).Syllogism, logic (deductive or inductive).


How do you formulate a deductive or inductive argument?

For a deductive argument, you start with a general premise and apply it to a specific case to reach a certain conclusion. In contrast, an inductive argument begins with specific observations and generalizes to a broader theory or principle. Both types aim to support a conclusion with appropriate reasoning and logic.


which is most important inductive or deductive reasoning?

which is the most important inductive or deductive reasoning


Is this phrase inductive or deductive Ignorance is the greatest cause of hatred and disorder in the world The best way to combat ignorance is through the dissemination of valid and accurate inform?

It is an inductive argument


What type of reasoning does a mathematical proof use?

Deductive reasoning In mathematics, a proof is a deductive argument for a mathematical statement. Deductive reasoning, unlike inductive reasoning, is a valid form of proof. It is, in fact, the way in which geometric proofs are written.


What is the different between inductive and deductive statistics?

Inductive statistic deals with prediction while deductive statistic deals with presumption