A living thing can have a skeleton without a backbone they are called invertebrates. However, they do not have a skeleton like the way that humans do. So no bones, but they may have an exoskeleton or cartilage or many more options.
no because your stupid
There is no such thing as an invertebrate with a skeleton. The definition of "invertebrate" is "one without a backbone."
It supports the skeleton and suppies a protection for the spinal chord. Basicaly it does exactly the same thing your spine/backbone does for you.
vertabrates(with backbone) and invertabrates(without backbone) :)
No, it is not a living thing because bones cannot grow and does not need air,food, water warmth to survive.Disagree with above. The skeleton of a LIVING animal is part of a living thing. Bones DO grow, and DO need food. When an animal dies, the skeleton also dies.
Plants do not have a phylum because a phylum is whether a living thing has a backbone or not.
An invertebrate is any living thing with a spine or backbone. Primates are not invertebrates because they do have backbones.
we study it because it helps us learn what a little thing can do without a backbone
Is it still on the bone?If yes, is the bone part of a fully formed skeleton?If yes, is the skeleton inside of a living animal?If yes, then yes, it is. Otherwise no.
a invertebrate system is when an animal or a thing grows/develops without a skeleton in their body
Manly two king of living thing lipids and proteins
No ... there muscle and there shell is the hardest thing your gonna find on them
both of them move, breath, eat, produce off springs, propagate and are living thing . only thing that differentiate them is their backbone.