yes, for example:If to people are in a car and one person is in possession, then you will both be charged.
Yes. You can be charged with possession of drug paraphernalia.
Every 45 seconds in America
Possession of a legend drug without a valid prescription can lead to various charges, including misdemeanors or felonies, depending on the circumstances and the drug involved. Consulting with a legal professional in your jurisdiction is necessary to understand the specific consequences.
Get a lawyer. No one on the internet is going to be able to adequately answer your question. Possession of ecstasy is a felony, so if you had a gun at the time, you might be charged...
Technically, you cannot be charged with harboring a runaway if the person has not been classifed as a runaway. However, if the person is found in your possession and they have no reason to be with you, then the police have every reason to question you.
If there is weapon in the home she is in grave danger of being charged with "possession" of a firearm, and YOU could also be charged as an accessory for knowingly allowing her to have access. It is NOT necessary to actually have the firearmn ON youir person to be charged with possession, mere 'ready access' to it serves as the prohibiting factor.
In what Country/State are you charged? And with exactly what type of weed(s)? Years ago, there was a person charged in California with possession of Cannibis Sativa. When the defendant was found to merely be in possession of Cannibis Indica, the person had to be released. Subsequently, the language of THAT law was "updated". Legal advice relies on a lack of slang terms. In Turkey, the sentence is death, if you can believe what you see in the movies.
there is no limitation in these circumstance
It means that whatever it was that you are being charged with was either on your person or within close enough proxmity to you to be under your control.
This depends on the exact charges brought, and the prior record of the person charged.
This depends on the exact charges brought, and the prior record of the person charged.
No, they were in, what is known in the law as, CONCURRENT POSSESSION. In plain English, they BOTH possessed it.