yes,me thinks
Yes you can live with one lung.
No you cannot live without your lungs. Some people are currently living on one lung but you must have at least one lung. The lung is responsible for collecting and distributing the oxygen you need in order to breathe.
you can survive with one lung, but not with out both, case in point in space without oxygen you have about 1 minute and 20 seconds to live without an air tank, its on nasa.com.
Yes, they can. Google it, and don't listen to people who only say "No" without a reason.
no, because asthma is a disorder in the airways, not the lungs in the first place. when triggered by an irritant, what happens is your windpipe narrows down, and mucus clogs it, causing breathing difficulties, and then an asthma attack. asthma has nothing to do with the lungs - they will still be perfectly normal.
i don't really know, but i will pray for those who do have lung cancer. There is a higher rate of cures and longer remissions than there used to be; some survivors are 10+ years! I'm a survivor of almost 2 years and hope I last at least that long!
Cuz then your penis won't fall off M'kay.
No you don't need all the organs in your respiratory system to live you can live with 1 lung.
On a scale from one to ten one lung isn't vital, important, since you can survive on one but you can't live without one, so I suppose a ten.
Heart, Liver, Brain, Kidney You can live off of only 1 lung or kidney and thanks to advanced medical technology a person can live with many jeopardized organs. However, the first 3 are imperative!
It depends on the local climate, and exactly what you mean by "shelter". In some climates, there's no real reason you shouldn't be able to survive indefinitely without shelter.
If a person was in love with you then this is what they would probably do: 1: Tell you 2: Always gazes at you 3: Acts like your the only person in the world that matters to them. 4: Cant live without you