No. In Article 2 section 3 the constitution states that there must be either two witnesses or a confession in open court.
No
No. In Article 2 section 3 the constitution states that there must be either two witnesses or a confession in open court.
For a person to be convicted of treason in the U.S, they must confess to the crime in open court or there must be testimony of two witnesses to the same treasonous act. Espionage is similar, but much easier to convict.
witnesses.
"No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act," says the Constitution. :)
It IS possible if his testimony and knowledge is strong enough AND, what's more important, the jury believes them.
No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two credible witnesses.
If the evidence against you - complainant's testimony - inestigator's testimony - physical evidence - photos - medical records - etc., is sufficient to convince the jury (or judge) of your guilt, yes, you can be convicted.
You mention, lack of evidence, and lack of witnesses. BUT - you don't mention the lack of a victim/complainant. You CAN be convicted on the testimony of victim alone.
After the war Tokyo Rose was convicted of treason. In 1974, key eye witnesses were found to have lied during testimony. She was pardoned by the U.S. president Gerald Ford in 1977.
To be convicted of treason, prosecutors need at least two eye witnesses. With out any witnesses, a person can not be convicted of treason.
The time limit for taking a US traitor to trial is three years. It is stated that no person should be convicted of Treason unless there is a testimony from two witnesses.
Captain Kidd was found guilty of piracy and murder in 1701. He was convicted based on evidence presented in court, including testimony from witnesses. Kidd was subsequently hanged in London.