yes
False. A scientific theory can be disproven if new evidence or observations contradict it. The strength of a scientific theory lies in its ability to withstand rigorous testing and scrutiny; however, it remains open to revision or rejection based on new data. This is a fundamental aspect of the scientific method, which emphasizes continual questioning and testing.
No. It's never correct to say that anything is "only" a theory or "just" a theory or"merely" a theory or "nothing but" a theory or an "unproven" theory.A theory can never be proven, but it can be dis-proven in two seconds. If a theoryhas been around for three hundred years and it hasn't been dis-proven yet, thenthat's a pretty good indication that you can trust the statement it makes.
This ongoing debate between religion (God created man) and science (theory of evolution) about "creation" has never been resolved as God, himself, can neither be proven nor dis-proven. Also, the theory of evolution has also yet to be proven.
Possibly. Their existence has neither been proven or dis proven.
That has never been proven -or dis-proven. -Personally, I doubt it.
They do not learn faster. That is a dis-proven myth.
A hypothesis is a proposed explanation for a phenomenon that can be tested through experimentation or observation, whereas a theory is a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence from multiple studies. The main difference is that a theory has been repeatedly tested and confirmed, while a hypothesis is still being investigated.
A scientific theory is just a hypothesis that has stood the test of repeated experimentation. A hypothesis is a wild guess, and the more fundamental you want to make your hypothesis, the more wild it becomes. A scientific theory can be invalidated by a single experiment, but can never be proved no matter how many experiments are conducted. It's often pointed out that one of the most important jobs of real scientists is to work to DIS-prove the current theories. The more that competent scientists are unable to disprove a theory, the more trustworthy and plausible the theory becomes.
No. It can never be "proven" true. It's always open to question, and to any demonstration of its failure.But after time goes by, and no evidence has been presented to demonstrate that the hypothesis fails, and the hypothesis has made predictions that were confirmed by experiments designed to test them, then the hypothesis may be elevated to the status of a theory. But it's still waiting to be debunked.Interesting that a theory can be dis-proven in a day, but can't be proven in a thousand years. That's Science.
The law of gravity is considered a law because it describes a consistent and well-established relationship between objects with mass. It has been extensively tested and confirmed through experiments and observations, making it a fundamental principle in physics. Theories, on the other hand, are broader explanations that encompass multiple laws and observations.
LAMARCK proposed the concepts of evolution called as Lamarckism.his theory consisted of two headings 1-use and dis use of organs 2-in heritance of acquired characters...
There are many scientific laws. They are scientific principles that have been tested by many scientists, and not been disproved. It takes a lot of scientific evidence to support a theory before it becomes law. A scientific law is a theory or hypothesis that has been tested various times through experimentation and has had data collected and observed.