A story can be written in first person- you talking about it personally from your own perspective. There is also second person, talking to the reader as 'you' making the reader feel like they are in the 'story'. Also there is third person- e.g. she/he was, she/he is, she/he has.
Yes, a story can be told by multiple narrators, each offering their own perspective and voice. This technique, known as multiple narrators or multi-narrative storytelling, can provide depth and complexity to the narrative by presenting different viewpoints and experiences. It invites readers to engage with the story from various angles, enhancing their understanding of the characters and plot.
Third person is used to step back from the narrator's mind and show more things than just what the narrator thinks about.
In the short story "Cathedral," Robert is initially perceived by the narrator as a blind man who lacks insight. However, as they spend time together, the narrator discovers that Robert is perceptive, open-minded, and capable of forming meaningful connections with others. This complexity makes Robert a more interesting character than the narrator had initially assumed.
No, it doesn't really matter if a character or an anonymous narrator tells the story. The reader is more interested in what's going on than in who's talking!
The narrator is neither a "man or a woman" since the narrator speaks in the plural rather than the singular. In that sense the narrator can be thought of as several or all of the townspeople telling the story.
The opposite of an omniscient narrator is a limited or restricted narrator, where the perspective is limited to the knowledge and experiences of only one or a few characters in the story. This type of narrator can only provide insight into thoughts and feelings of specific characters, rather than knowing everything that is happening in the story.
One of the main reasons is because with a first person narrator, the reader gets to hear his/her thoughts and motivations. This usually means that we, as readers, become more involved in the personal story of the character.
It is most likely that the lawyer-narrator is the protagonist. The reader's perception of Bartleby is always coloured by the narrator's perception. Furthermore, we learn more about the narrator's emotional state/attitude toward the times than we do about Bartelby's. Bartleby acts as a symbol and as such, provides insight into society for the reader.
According to the narrator Shaila, the Irish response to her grief is much more friendly and open than that of the Canadians.
Being burnt alive. The narrator reflects on how death by fire is a more painful and agonizing way to die compared to being sliced by the pendulum.
A third-person omniscient narrator would typically focus more on facts and events rather than delving deeply into characters' emotions. This narrator has knowledge of all characters' thoughts and feelings, but tends to maintain a more objective and factual tone in the storytelling.
offers an objective perspective on the story, allowing the author to provide insight into multiple characters' thoughts and experiences. This can create a more comprehensive and nuanced portrayal of the events unfolding in the narrative. By using a third-person narrator, the author can maintain a level of distance that can add depth and complexity to the storytelling.
I just want free points