A virtual black hole would probably not exist long, so it won't have much time to absorb anything. Other than that, I don't see any reason why it should make a difference between particles and antiparticles.
I don't know, but the Void and Black Hole tools are similar to antimatter.
Just the same as if normal matter falls in. The matter or antimatter will stay there, increasing the mass of the black hole (and making it more "hungry", i.e., making its gravity stronger).
No. It's still regular matter, only enormously compressed.
This is a black hole formed from antimatter, instead of matter. The only real difference thereby being that the matter within the black hole would have an opposite charge from normal matter. Other than that, an antimatter black hole, while still theoretical at this point, should have properties the same as a black hole formed from 'normal' matter. As with a normal black hole, an antimatter black hole would be created by having enough antimatter to cause a gravitational collapse.
No, Antimatter while annihilate our matter, meaning that it will completely convert our matter to light and heat, however antimatter is highly theoretical, and the LHC probably will not create any.
Within a black hole, the distinctions between regular matter and antimatter disappear.
yes
As far as we know, the mass of the black-hole and it's energy would increase.
That's not exactly what happens. What really happens is that they just absorb each other and become a bigger black hole.
A black hole is a type of star with excessive gravity. Here are some sentences.The star was sucked into the black hole close by.A black hole will even absorb light.The scientist is studying a black hole.
You cannot see a black hole when you are on Earth, unless a black hole were to absorb Earth, which even then, you would see it in a split-second before it would engulf you
No it also online