No, Antimatter while annihilate our matter, meaning that it will completely convert our matter to light and heat, however antimatter is highly theoretical, and the LHC probably will not create any.
I don't know, but the Void and Black Hole tools are similar to antimatter.
Just the same as if normal matter falls in. The matter or antimatter will stay there, increasing the mass of the black hole (and making it more "hungry", i.e., making its gravity stronger).
No. It's still regular matter, only enormously compressed.
This is a black hole formed from antimatter, instead of matter. The only real difference thereby being that the matter within the black hole would have an opposite charge from normal matter. Other than that, an antimatter black hole, while still theoretical at this point, should have properties the same as a black hole formed from 'normal' matter. As with a normal black hole, an antimatter black hole would be created by having enough antimatter to cause a gravitational collapse.
Within a black hole, the distinctions between regular matter and antimatter disappear.
No, a black hole is not made of antimatter. A black hole is formed when a massive star collapses under its own gravity to a point of infinite density, known as a singularity. Antimatter is composed of particles with properties opposite to those of normal matter, such as having opposite electric charge.
As far as we know, the mass of the black-hole and it's energy would increase.
The potential relationship between antimatter and black holes is not fully understood, but some theories suggest that antimatter could be present in the vicinity of black holes. Antimatter is the opposite of normal matter, and when it comes into contact with regular matter, they annihilate each other, releasing a large amount of energy. In the extreme conditions near a black hole, it is possible that antimatter could be created or attracted, leading to unique interactions and phenomena. Further research is needed to fully understand this potential relationship.
Scientists aren't even sureother universes exist. The possibility a black hole could even lead somewhere else is practically impossible. Whatever enters a black hole is virtually destroyed in a flash of raw energy. That's why scientists think that 99.999999999999% of the universe's antimatter is in black holes.
A black hole
A virtual black hole would probably not exist long, so it won't have much time to absorb anything. Other than that, I don't see any reason why it should make a difference between particles and antiparticles.
They annihilate each other, releasing a relatively large quantity of energy, which can be calculated using the formula e=mc2, where e is the released energy in joules, m is the mass of the particles in kilograms, and c is the speed of light in metres per second