Viruses has a charateristics of being alive but they are NOT since they are single-cell organisms.
It's a virus. It's alive.
A virus does not fulfill all requirements for life, eg. no reproduction through meiosis or mitosis
Neither. A virus is not really alive in a traditional sense.
No.
A pathogenic bacterium is alive while a virus is not.
No: Mumps is a virus, and by definition viruses are nonliving, neither dead or alive.
It is a virus and not alive but if blood or any body fluids are in the soil, someone who touches the contaminated soil can get the virus.
Because it is caused by a virus, H1N1 is not actually alive. Viruses are called "active" or "inactive" usually, because they are different than bacteria and other microbes that are actually living microscopic organisms.
They are not classified into a kingdom as they are not alive.
It is called a virus because we have an illness called a "virus" and when a computer GETS a virus, they're not working right and are not running well.
The HIV virus can only be transferred through blood, so no.
Viruses are not alive and so do not "eat".