I am sure there are some doctors that would do this however my question to you is.... WHY IN THE HELL would you want to possibly expose an innocent child to a disease such as HIV? I know the risks are minimal now due to technology but there is still a huge risk involved. Not only that but this disease will at some point take over your body and you will die leaving a child without a mother. Don't you think that's selfish?
It is better to be HIV negative than HIV positive. An HIV positive person is infected with HIV.
You might have trouble getting someone to perform the operation. It's not life saving and it will put the operating staff at greater risk than for a patient that's not HIV positive. You should also consider the risk of transferring HIV to the baby, that is not something you'd want your baby to start out with.
If a person tests positive for the HIV antibody, it means that person has the HIV infection.
A carrier is a person who carries HIV but does not get infected by it.HIV positive is a person that has HIV and gets infected by it.
HIV positive
The underling root of HIV is direct sex. When a person is HIV positive and another person is HIV negative and they have direct sex, the HIV moves into the HIV negative person and the HIV is now positive in both of the persons.
No
No.
No.
No, there are not any signs immediately after infection that a person is HIV positive.
A person infected with HIV is generally referred to as being HIV+ (positive.) Often times, it is shortened to just "positive."
Person with 512 cd4 count he or she HIV positive