An Earthquake can be far deadlier.
Fore example the Earthquake in Haiti killed over had a death toll over 200,000.
The deadliest tornado in world history (in Bangladesh) killed about 1,300.
Earthquakes when properly prepared for however can be far less damaging than the one in Haiti. Tornados can be far deadlier however, because they cannot be predicted and their paths are random.
earthquakes are more dangerous because it has the element of surprise and hurricane they tell you when it is coming
Not at all. A tornado, in simplest terms, is a violent vortex of wind and and earthquake in simplest terms, is the ground shaking.
Yes. But the two phenomena are not related even remotely. So if a tornado were to follow an earthquake it would be entirely by coincidence.
A hurricane
tornado,earthquake,hurricane, and blizzard
In terms of energy output an earthquake is the most powerful.
tornado warning hurricane fire any really deadly storms
earthquake
It isn't. An earthquake releases far more energy than a tornado.
It depends on the size of the tornado and the how strong the earthquake is. Most earthquakes are small on average, so most of the time a tornado is stronger.
There was a deadly F4 tornado that likely hit the Auburndale area on April 4, 1966.
In terms of energy output an earthquake is stronger.
Yes. But the two phenomena are not related even remotely. So if a tornado were to follow an earthquake it would be entirely by coincidence.
To date, nobody in the history of California has been killed by a tornado.
disastrous as an earthquake/tornado...
3 major earthquakes and 3 tornadoes were recorded in 1925. They were: The 1925 Dali earthquake, the Charlevoix-Kamouraska earthquake and the Santa Barbra earthquake. The 1925 Miami tornado, the Southern Illinois tornado and the Tri-State tornado.
there are no benefits to any disaster like a tornado or earthquake or floods.
Yes!
It is possible but extremely unlikely. If a tornado an earthquake were to strike at the same time it would be purely by coincidence.