In 1963, the Navy was searching for a new plane to serve in the Carrier Onboard Delivery, or COD, program. The plane they used had a 300-mile range. The Chief of Naval Operations ordered a feasibility study of using the C-130 on aircraft carriers. Lt. James Flatley III, a fighter pilot attached to [i]USS Forrestal,[/i] landed a Marine Corps KC-130 refueling variant on the Forrestal in October 1963. He performed 29 touch-and-go landings, 21 unassisted full-stop landings (no tailhook on the Hercules!) and 21 unassisted (no catapult) takeoffs at weights up to the aircraft's maximum rated weight. For his efforts, Lt. Flatley, who would later be promoted to Captain, was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross. As for the Hercules "Super COD" project, the Navy decided that even though the plane was clearly capable of landing on a carrier, using it in regular service was inviting disaster and went with a smaller airframe.
Yes. A C 130 landed on the USS Forestall on October 30, 1963. It was a planned landing performed by the USN and Lockheed. The entire deck was cleared of aircraft and personnel during both landing and takeoff. The 130's wingspan cleared the ship's island by 15'. The Navy opted for a smaller carrier on board delivery (COD) aircraft after the test was completed called the C1 Trader.
Maybe, if it was equipped with a tailhook to catch the arresting gear on the flight deck. Without a tailhook, nobody is going to be landing on an aircraft carrier except for helicopters.
Also, an A-10 might be too heavy to TAKE OFF from an aircraft carrier.
No. The B-2 is too big and too slow to take off and land on an aircraft carrier. During WWII; B-25 s took off from the carrier Hornet, but, that was the only option to attack Japan in 1942. C-130s have taken off and landed from carriers, but, that was just an experiment. The B-2 uses air to air refueling from airborne tankers. The B-2 does not need to take off and land from an aircraft carrier.
No. The C-130 wasn't around during WWII, and it's too big to land on an aircraft carrier.
No. Aircraft have to be specially designed & equipped to land & take-off from Carriers. Also the pilot has to be trained extensively.
Yes
No, it can not. F-15N was a proposed version for carrier operations but it was not built. No F-15 can land or start from the carrier.
Lockheed Martin built the U-2 spy-plane, F-16, F-22, F-35, the AC-130 aircraft, the SR-71 Blackbird and the F-117.
There really isn't a max speed of an F/A-18 landing on an aircraft carrier because: (skip to the bottom for the general and quick answer which is just a guess) 1) If the aircraft was going too fast, the tail hook would break upon hooking onto the wires 2) If the aircraft was going too fast, the wires the plane uses to stop would snap when the tail hook hooked them at a high speed 3)If the aircraft was flying over a speed of 240 knots (nautical miles per hour) the planes landing gear and flaps would automtically retract 4) The perfered speed to land (or the speed you should be traveling if you are doing everything right) should be 135 knots 5)If you were going too fast, the Landing Signal Officer (or LSO) would tell you to wave off (or abort the current landing pattern and realign for a new landing) So if there had to be a max speed to land on a carrier I'd say it would probably be about 150-160 knots
"CASU" stands for Combat Aircraft Support Unit; the "F" stands for Forward Area.The listing would normally be spelled out like this:CASU(F)-13, Det. ARead properly, it would read:Combat Aircraft Support Unit, Forward Area 13, Detachment A, U.S. NavyRecords show that CASU(F)-13 was forward deployed in the Southwest Pacific on the islands of Pityilu and Ponamin Manus Province Papua New Guinea beginning in late 1945.CASU also stands for "Carrier Aircraft Support Unit" - however, the "F" indicates it as a forward unit shore base, and not a shipboard unit.
The most powerful combat aircraft in the World is the United States F-22 Raptor, Russian Mig-29, the republic of China and Taiwan Mig-35.
F-16s are part of the United States Air Force, not the United States Navy. F-16s are incapable of operating with an aircraft carrier due to the fact that they do not have the required equipment to launch from or land on an aircraft carrier.
No, it is restricted to landing on either a conventional runway, or on the deck of an aircraft carrier.
No, it can not. F-15N was a proposed version for carrier operations but it was not built. No F-15 can land or start from the carrier.
The F-14 can take off from a conventional land based runway or from the deck of an aircraft carrier utilizing the ship's catapult system.
NONE f-22 is an air force plane; air force planes don't land on aircraft carriers it would kill their landing gear. F-22s don't have arrestor gear or the means of attaching to the catapult system. The F-35 is the newest carrier born aircraft currently still in the testing phase of carrier landings. Different versions are built,one being a verticle take off and landing capable plane the other being a catapult launched version.
CV is a carrier. CVE is an escort carrier. CVL was a light carrier. No "R" in those names.
F stand for Fighter. 16 is the model number for the jet aircraft fighter. Just like the F-15.
5151211
No, India does not have F-16
In US service it is a fighter aircraft. However, the Israeli Air Force loves it and has developed recce, bomber and multi-role aircraft from it. Their latest, the F-16 "Sufa" is a real winner.
It is exactly 16 ft to the top of the tail.
The US Air Force identifies their operational aircraft by model numbers that follow a letter code. The codes are: F - fighter aircraft, A-ground attack, B- bomber aircraft, C- cargo aircraft, X- experimental. Many years ago, the military used other code identifiers that are may not by used: P- pursuit aircraft, O- observation, H- helicopter. The F-16 is the 16th fighter design built during the jet age. It was built after the F-15. What confuses me is how did they jump up to F-117 for the Stealth Fighter?