No, because they are entirely opposite concepts.
Copyright is a bundle of rights ascribed to the creator of a work, giving them the exclusive right to copy, alter, distribute, or perform or display the work, or authorize others to do so, for a limited time.
Plagiarism is representing another's creative work as your own.
The act of plagiarizing may or may not be copyright infringement as well, but those concepts also have enough differences that they should not be used interchangeably.
No, copyright and plagiarism are not interchangeable terms. Copyright refers to the legal rights granted to the creator of an original work to control its use and distribution. Plagiarism, on the other hand, is the act of using someone else's work or ideas without giving them credit. While plagiarism can involve copyright infringement, not all cases of plagiarism involve copyright violation and vice versa.
Copyright and plagiarism are alike because they both protect an author's work. Copyright protects all sorts of writing and creative content while plagiarism is a way you can violate that.
Plagiarism and copyright infringement.
Only if it is used for plagiarism for unauthorized profit.
Plagiarism on YouTube can result in your video being taken down or a copyright strike being issued, but it is unlikely to lead to an arrest. However, if the plagiarism involves severe copyright infringement or other legal issues, it is possible for legal action to be taken against you, which could potentially lead to legal consequences.
Plagiarism is illegal if it involves copyright violation or theft of other intellectual property. If no violation of copyright is involved, plagiarism is unethical, not illegal.Protecting copyright and other intellectual property does not need an Amendment. Freedom of speech has never meant that everyone's writings, drawings, and so on are up for grabs.
I assume you are asking the difference between plagiarism & copyright infringement. While both are essentially the use of someone elses work without permission, the most significant difference is that plagiarism also involves claiming that material as your own work.
That is both copyright infringement and plagiarism.
There are no plagiarism "laws". COpyright law gives a "for hire" author no rights to the work done for that hire.
In most places, plagiarism is not a criminal act. It can result in criminal charges for fraud if used to deceive. It could result in personal injury charges as well. It can also result in a lawsuit for violation of copyright.
Taking someone else's work as your own is called plagiarism.
Not always. Plagiarism is making a false claim that you created something original. If you copied a public domain source, it is not a copyright infringement, but still plagiarism. For example, you download a NASA photograph (all works created by the US government are public domain in the USA), modify it and submit it to a photo contest as your original work. That is plagiarism, not copyright infringement.
Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's words, ideas, or work without giving them proper credit. Copyright refers to the legal protection of original works of authorship, giving the owner exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and display the work.