Absolutely.
First, let's get it out of the way that copyrights are used by their owners for economic gain all the time, which is what the law was designed to do. Protected materials can also be licensed for use by others who intend to make a profit from them: when there's a Mattel toy in a Happy Meal, Mattel isn't the only company making money from it, and when a movie plays in a theater, the theater, the distributor, and the studio are all getting something from that.
But in addition to that, the limitations, defenses, and exceptions included in the law allow a lot of unlicenseduses generally assumed to be non-commercial, but not exclusively. See the link below for a study on the economic benefits of the exploitation of fair use in the US (however, please note that this is a rather one-sided approach, to which content owners will almost entirely disagree).
economic gain is to help the country grow in economy and finance.
killing animals for economic gain is acceptable
killing animals for economic gain is acceptable
The definition of economic gain is opportunity costs that are deducted from revenues earned. Economic gains are good as it means a country is growing financially and economically.
gain economic advantages for its members
Profit.
Economic gain was the colonists' main motivation among other things. The would settle in places where there were resources which could bring economic gains to them.
An economic interest group works to gain economic advantages for its members.
financial gains made in an economic transaction
To gain political or economic advantages.
economic and political gain.
penis