The definition of assault and battery differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.
If the property is intimately related to the individual. If I'm sitting in a car and you attack the car, it can be termed a battery. If you destroy my clothing, it could be considered a battery. Attacking my house when I am not home is not a battery, but it could be considered an assault and even a battery if I am home and see you attacking.
In Wisconsin it doesn't matter whether you are in something or not. Battery can only be charged if the assault is happening against a person, not a inanimate object. You can smash someones car to smitherines and they can be in it, but if they are not injured in any way, the perpetrator will not be charged with battery, but with criminal destruction of property, disorderly conduct, etc.
the Valdas reputation was so bad that we called it the destruction of property
Vandalism
yes
burgundy
Intentional destruction of property is vandalism.
Graffiti is 'vandalism,' 'destruction of property' and insofar as it pertains to a public school building, 'destruction of government property'
Reversing the cables when you connect them. Overcharging the battery.
Yes, driving across someone else's grass is trespassing and any destruction would be destruction of property. They could bring suit for both.
Vandalism, destruction of property.
The destruction of federal property of more than $1000 in Maine would likely be classified as a felony offense. The specific classification would depend on the laws of Maine and the nature and circumstances of the destruction, but it could potentially fall under felony property damage or destruction charges.
Its always possible, but on rare occasions.
The answer to this question cannot be known. The presiding judge will have the final answer on this. The person that destroyed the property is probably chargeable with civil contempt of court, which carries no jail time - but also possibly for the criminal charge of destruction of property.