No, you certainly can't! Other than the fact that they are both made from corn, they aren't remotely alike.
Starch is not soluble so therefore a higher concentration will have more starch molecules stopping light from going through.
to denature the enzymes going to kill the leaf
It is of course going to be the baggie...why not!
Positive!
They're is a contraction of "they are". There is a place name substitute. The correct sentence is "They're (they are) going to the store".
if it were in the right context then yes the wrong context would be... "i am going to party!" "i am going to fiesta!"
The pylons in lacrosse is the "box". The box is where you substitute players going on and off the field.
Semolina is 100% wheat, so a real alternative is not going to be that similar. You could try ground rice, which is available for the same sort of uses in the UK. Depending on what you want to avoid in the wheat, corn grits might work.
I don't think they are simple carbohydrates. I vaguely recall learning years ago in school that 'starch' is a complex carbohydrate. Therefore, I'm going to venture and say that neither of them a simple carbohydrates.
There isn't one. Or rather, there might be in some applications, but you're going to have to be a lot more specific.
A hamburger may or may not have starch in it. A hamburger starts out as ground beef. That is the basic patty. If you purchase it that way and cook it yourself, it does not contain starch. A number of companies add soy meal (or other products) to ground beef to make hamburger patties. In that case a hamburger contains starch. If you eat your hamburger in a bun, or add garnishes, or cheese, or a number of other products, you added starch. So, a hamburger may or may not have starch.
Take whatever you believe to be the time that humankind came into existance, then substitute that number for your answer.....