yes if a it gets to out of controll.
normally no, its up to the jury to decide, but yes if its out of control.
The methods of judicial selection for federal appellate judges state appellate and state trial judges
Peter Oliver was one of the trial judges.
In a bench trial, yes. In a jury trial, this is up to the jury.
What they did was legal at the time. And besides, the judges were hired by the government to preside over the trials.
their decisions are usually final
The judge follows the Constitutional protections given to the accused. She must also follow the rules of evidence and respect precedent.
A witch trial is called that because witches were literally tried in court with judges, procescutors and witnesses/evidence.
Control accounts cannot get into a trial balance because that would be tantamount to double entering the figures though individual accounts and then throuhg the trial control accounts.
At trial, one. On appeal, it depends on the court.
Over the Federalist Judges
Trial of the Major War Criminals , Dachau Trials , Auschwitz Trial , Belsen Trial , Frankfurt Auschwitz Trials , Mauthausen-Gusen camp trials , Ravensbrück Trial , Doctors' Trial , Milch Trial , Judges' Trial , Pohl Trial , Flick Trial , IG Farben Trial , Hostages Trial , RuSHA Trial , Einsatzgruppen Trial , Krupp Trial , Ministries Trial , High Command Trial .
(in the US) There is no comparison. The only alternative to a jury trial is a trial in front of a SINGLE judge. Panels of judges do not come into play unless/until a case reaches the Appelate level of court, and in appelate court no jury option exists.